<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Difference between concurrent and simultaneous vuser</title> <atom:link href="http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/</link> <description>Best Source for Online LoadRunner Training</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 05:29:42 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Ritesh</title><link>http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-1441</link> <dc:creator>Ritesh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:19:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-1441</guid> <description>Please correct blog:Simultaneous users have active connections to the same Web site, whereas concurrent users hit the site at exactly the same moment. Concurrent access is likely to occur at infrequent intervals. Your site may have 100 to 150 concurrent users but 1,000 to 1,500 simultaneous users.When load testing your application, you can simulate simultaneous users by including a random think time in your script such that not all the user threads from the load generator are firing requests at the same moment. This is useful to simulate real world situations.for more information(Check workload section):
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff647788.aspx</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please correct blog:</p><p>Simultaneous users have active connections to the same Web site, whereas concurrent users hit the site at exactly the same moment. Concurrent access is likely to occur at infrequent intervals. Your site may have 100 to 150 concurrent users but 1,000 to 1,500 simultaneous users.</p><p>When load testing your application, you can simulate simultaneous users by including a random think time in your script such that not all the user threads from the load generator are firing requests at the same moment. This is useful to simulate real world situations.</p><p>for more information(Check workload section):<br
/> <a
href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff647788.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff647788.aspx</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sunny Azam</title><link>http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-478</link> <dc:creator>Sunny Azam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 16:17:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-478</guid> <description>This is very good website for lR. Now I am facing a problem, I cannot record anything. When Every thing is fine, LR opens as usual but does not record anything.
I&#039;ll be more than happy if you let me know it.Sunny.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very good website for lR. Now I am facing a problem, I cannot record anything. When Every thing is fine, LR opens as usual but does not record anything.<br
/> I&#8217;ll be more than happy if you let me know it.</p><p>Sunny.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rahul</title><link>http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-418</link> <dc:creator>Rahul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:14:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-418</guid> <description>Hi,
I am very new to loadrunner, but have decent exposure to QTP.
I have question for loadrunner testing
Consider that my business process is mapped in loadrunner in the form of 3 separate test scripts that require 3 different login and logoff sessions. The 3rd test script is dependant on 2nd and 2nd in turn on first and these are dependant business workflow.
Can I schedule to run these 3 test scripts in bvelow fashionstart testing
Start TS 1 with vusers 10 and ramp up to 100---------30 minutes duration
Continue to run TS1 and start TS 2 with 20 vusers--20 minutes duration
Reduce vusers for TS 1 to 10 and continue -----------5 minutes duration
continue TS1, TS2 and start TS3 with 30 vusers-----30 minutes duration
ramp down the vusers for all TS
stop</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br
/> I am very new to loadrunner, but have decent exposure to QTP.<br
/> I have question for loadrunner testing<br
/> Consider that my business process is mapped in loadrunner in the form of 3 separate test scripts that require 3 different login and logoff sessions. The 3rd test script is dependant on 2nd and 2nd in turn on first and these are dependant business workflow.<br
/> Can I schedule to run these 3 test scripts in bvelow fashion</p><p>start testing<br
/> Start TS 1 with vusers 10 and ramp up to 100&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;30 minutes duration<br
/> Continue to run TS1 and start TS 2 with 20 vusers&#8211;20 minutes duration<br
/> Reduce vusers for TS 1 to 10 and continue &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;5 minutes duration<br
/> continue TS1, TS2 and start TS3 with 30 vusers&#8212;&#8211;30 minutes duration<br
/> ramp down the vusers for all TS<br
/> stop</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kamran Khan</title><link>http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-234</link> <dc:creator>Kamran Khan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:03:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-234</guid> <description>@Jacintha
Introducing lr_rendesvous create concurrency at that point - the immediate next function will be executed at single point in time (causing maximum pressure/load on DB/app/web servers. web_concurrent_start statement can be used for concurrent execution of a series of steps as Manish quoted.@Lina
First, change in controller to simulate 500 users doesnt mean 500 concurrent users.These are 500 simultaneous users (and could be 2 or 2 overlapping/concurrent users by chance)
User and VUser is same. Controller decides the number of VUsers to simulate and not script. If you mention 10 users_name in script and run controller with 100 (assuming multiple instances are possible) then you&#039;re testing application with 100 Users.Second, having multiple iterations for various actions doesnt mean additional users. 100 VUsers and 1000000 iterations each - will simulate a load of 100 vusers only.Third, if you use random/once for pramaterization then provide unique data for order number/name (whatever is required to be unique) - if it is coming from server as response, you need to correlate your script.I hope that addresses your issues - although pretty late.Sincerely,
www.Kamran-Khan.net</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jacintha<br
/> Introducing lr_rendesvous create concurrency at that point &#8211; the immediate next function will be executed at single point in time (causing maximum pressure/load on DB/app/web servers. web_concurrent_start statement can be used for concurrent execution of a series of steps as Manish quoted.</p><p>@Lina<br
/> First, change in controller to simulate 500 users doesnt mean 500 concurrent users.These are 500 simultaneous users (and could be 2 or 2 overlapping/concurrent users by chance)<br
/> User and VUser is same. Controller decides the number of VUsers to simulate and not script. If you mention 10 users_name in script and run controller with 100 (assuming multiple instances are possible) then you&#8217;re testing application with 100 Users.</p><p>Second, having multiple iterations for various actions doesnt mean additional users. 100 VUsers and 1000000 iterations each &#8211; will simulate a load of 100 vusers only.</p><p>Third, if you use random/once for pramaterization then provide unique data for order number/name (whatever is required to be unique) &#8211; if it is coming from server as response, you need to correlate your script.</p><p>I hope that addresses your issues &#8211; although pretty late.</p><p>Sincerely,<br
/> <a
href="http://www.Kamran-Khan.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.Kamran-Khan.net</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Manish</title><link>http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-163</link> <dc:creator>Manish</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:02:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-163</guid> <description>The explanation you have give in vice versa. For ex: in load runner script, we have two function i.e. web_concurrent_start(NULL) and web_concurrent_end(NULL). These functions perform concurrency. Its like a rendezvous point when all the URLs get loaded concurrently while in rendezvous point all vusers loaded concurrently.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The explanation you have give in vice versa. For ex: in load runner script, we have two function i.e. web_concurrent_start(NULL) and web_concurrent_end(NULL). These functions perform concurrency. Its like a rendezvous point when all the URLs get loaded concurrently while in rendezvous point all vusers loaded concurrently.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lina</title><link>http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-154</link> <dc:creator>lina</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 08:50:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-154</guid> <description>thank you that was so clear , however i have another problem in understanding concurent users , if i have a script with 100 vuser on yahoo 1) Login, 2) Check no of unread mails 3) Logout
and they iterate for taks no 2) twice   and in the controller  i edit to 500 Vuser to run conncurrently ? please confirm if  the below is true :
1- 500 concurrent user will run
2- each with 100 vuser and it will iterate for task no 2) ( all will run as vuser squence at the script)
my question is:
If i use Pramaterization for vuser random/once/...etc  the possibilty of use to run with multisessions that may cause conflict at DB side (if Vusers are submitting order for example)
how can i prevent that??thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you that was so clear , however i have another problem in understanding concurent users , if i have a script with 100 vuser on yahoo 1) Login, 2) Check no of unread mails 3) Logout<br
/> and they iterate for taks no 2) twice   and in the controller  i edit to 500 Vuser to run conncurrently ? please confirm if  the below is true :<br
/> 1- 500 concurrent user will run<br
/> 2- each with 100 vuser and it will iterate for task no 2) ( all will run as vuser squence at the script)<br
/> my question is:<br
/> If i use Pramaterization for vuser random/once/&#8230;etc  the possibilty of use to run with multisessions that may cause conflict at DB side (if Vusers are submitting order for example)<br
/> how can i prevent that??</p><p>thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ankur</title><link>http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-101</link> <dc:creator>Ankur</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:41:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-101</guid> <description>That&#039;s why I made it as a seperate post. There is a lot of confusion regarding these terms.You may want to check the ongoing discussion at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums13.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=109447627+1233657445010+28353475&amp;threadId=1254060&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HP LoadRunner forums.&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why I made it as a seperate post. There is a lot of confusion regarding these terms.</p><p>You may want to check the ongoing discussion at the <a
href="http://forums13.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=109447627+1233657445010+28353475&#038;threadId=1254060" rel="nofollow">HP LoadRunner forums.</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jacintha</title><link>http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-97</link> <dc:creator>Jacintha</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:33:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-97</guid> <description>can you please revisit your statement. I guess the explanation given here is vice versa.Because normally the Simulataneous Users are always greater than concurrent users. when we take a banking application, simultaneous users would be 50000 users whereas concurrent users would be 5000 only.
Please correct me if i am wrong.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you please revisit your statement. I guess the explanation given here is vice versa.Because normally the Simulataneous Users are always greater than concurrent users. when we take a banking application, simultaneous users would be 50000 users whereas concurrent users would be 5000 only.<br
/> Please correct me if i am wrong.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/8 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 807/809 objects using disk: basic

Served from: learnloadrunner.com @ 2012-05-18 14:36:14 -->
