<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Difference between concurrent and simultaneous vuser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/</link>
	<description>Learn LoadRunner With Me!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:36:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Manish</title>
		<link>http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Manish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-163</guid>
		<description>The explanation you have give in vice versa. For ex: in load runner script, we have two function i.e. web_concurrent_start(NULL) and web_concurrent_end(NULL). These functions perform concurrency. Its like a rendezvous point when all the URLs get loaded concurrently while in rendezvous point all vusers loaded concurrently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The explanation you have give in vice versa. For ex: in load runner script, we have two function i.e. web_concurrent_start(NULL) and web_concurrent_end(NULL). These functions perform concurrency. Its like a rendezvous point when all the URLs get loaded concurrently while in rendezvous point all vusers loaded concurrently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lina</title>
		<link>http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>lina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 08:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>thank you that was so clear , however i have another problem in understanding concurent users , if i have a script with 100 vuser on yahoo 1) Login, 2) Check no of unread mails 3) Logout 
and they iterate for taks no 2) twice   and in the controller  i edit to 500 Vuser to run conncurrently ? please confirm if  the below is true :
1- 500 concurrent user will run 
2- each with 100 vuser and it will iterate for task no 2) ( all will run as vuser squence at the script)
my question is:
If i use Pramaterization for vuser random/once/...etc  the possibilty of use to run with multisessions that may cause conflict at DB side (if Vusers are submitting order for example)
how can i prevent that??

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you that was so clear , however i have another problem in understanding concurent users , if i have a script with 100 vuser on yahoo 1) Login, 2) Check no of unread mails 3) Logout<br />
and they iterate for taks no 2) twice   and in the controller  i edit to 500 Vuser to run conncurrently ? please confirm if  the below is true :<br />
1- 500 concurrent user will run<br />
2- each with 100 vuser and it will iterate for task no 2) ( all will run as vuser squence at the script)<br />
my question is:<br />
If i use Pramaterization for vuser random/once/&#8230;etc  the possibilty of use to run with multisessions that may cause conflict at DB side (if Vusers are submitting order for example)<br />
how can i prevent that??</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankur</title>
		<link>http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why I made it as a seperate post. There is a lot of confusion regarding these terms. 

You may want to check the ongoing discussion at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums13.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=109447627+1233657445010+28353475&amp;threadId=1254060&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HP LoadRunner forums.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why I made it as a seperate post. There is a lot of confusion regarding these terms. </p>
<p>You may want to check the ongoing discussion at the <a href="http://forums13.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=109447627+1233657445010+28353475&#038;threadId=1254060" rel="nofollow">HP LoadRunner forums.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacintha</title>
		<link>http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacintha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnloadrunner.com/introduction/difference-concurrent-vs-simultaneous-vuser/#comment-97</guid>
		<description>can you please revisit your statement. I guess the explanation given here is vice versa.Because normally the Simulataneous Users are always greater than concurrent users. when we take a banking application, simultaneous users would be 50000 users whereas concurrent users would be 5000 only.
Please correct me if i am wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you please revisit your statement. I guess the explanation given here is vice versa.Because normally the Simulataneous Users are always greater than concurrent users. when we take a banking application, simultaneous users would be 50000 users whereas concurrent users would be 5000 only.<br />
Please correct me if i am wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
